I was playing with an idea that Haskell might be a right language to describe an Enterprise Architecture. Haskell’s strong type system, functional programming paradigm, and support for domain-specific languages (DSLs) make it a good candidate for modeling enterprise architecture (EA). Here’s why and how: Why Haskell is Suitable for Enterprise Architecture: 🔗 Strong Typing & Type Safety: Enterprise architecture models deal with various interconnected components (like applications, data, infrastructure, processes).

Enterprise Architecture (EA) involves a structured approach to aligning IT infrastructure and business processes with organizational goals. To support this, various artifacts are created that serve as models, documentation, and representations of the organization’s systems. These artifacts help communicate, plan, and govern the architecture across different stakeholders. The main artifacts of enterprise architecture typically fall into several categories: Business Architecture Artifacts Business Capability Model: A high-level map of the organization’s abilities to meet business goals.

Disclaimer: This fairy tale is generated by ChatGPT based on true story. Once upon a time in the quirky land of Databasia, there existed a splendid PostgreSQL cluster. It was a harmonious symphony of data, with a Primary node leading the ensemble and a Secondary node providing the sweet, reassuring notes of redundancy. Life was good, data flowed seamlessly, and administrators everywhere slept soundly. However, every paradise has its serpent. In this case, it was a curious admin named Dave.